URANIUM NEWS

AUGUST 14th , 2008

IN THIS ISSUE:

1) IS IT TRUE? HAS DRILLING BEGUN? MIREILLE COMMENTS

2) NON-VIOLENCE TRAINING, OSO HALL, SHARBOT LAKE, aft. AUG 17TH

3) REMINDERS:
3a) August 28th, MNDM MINING ACT CONSULTATIONS,KINGSTON, ON


3b) Aug 30 & 31st AAFN POW WOW, Plevna, ON

3c) Sept 1st, WQ-CAMU FUNDRAISER - WHITEWATER RAFTING. Davidson, QC

4) Articles:
4a) RESIDENTS WANT TIGHTER TOXIC WATER POLLUTION LIMITS


4b) PORT HOPE RESIDENTS DEMAND CAMECO CORPORATION STOP DUMPING URANIUM INTO LAKE

4c) NOW YOU SEE IT, NOW YOU DON'T: UPDATE ON URANIUM IN N.S.

4d) URANIUM THREAT - NEW BRUNSWICKERS SAY OUR PROVINCE WILL NOT BE THE NEXT RABBIT LAKE!

5) "LIVING ON EARTH AS IF WE WANT TO STAY" TOUR HEADS EAST

6) DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATING THE NUCLEAR CYCLE, COURTESY OF DR. GORDON EDWARDS

7) LETTER TO THE EDITOR - KINGSTON WHIG, by Donna Dillman


8) LETTER TO STEVEN HARPER, Carmi Gallant

1) IS IT TRUE? HAS DRILLING BEGUN? MIREILLE COMMENTS

Kwey all
In a telephone conversation yesterday, I was informed that people believe that drilling is indeed happening, are discouraged and feel we have lost the fight.

The result of unsubstantiated stories is often negative and quite damaging. This is a case in point. I don't know where this rumour is coming from but I have confirmation from a sure and substantiated source that NO drilling is happening. There is a skidder working and making lots of noise, but no drilling.

We have NOT lost the fight.... and I am not discouraged.

On Wednesday, our negotiators and lawyer are meeting with the government to restate our position. It has never changed from the beginning.

There will be a hearing on August 27, 9:30 a.m. - MNR vs FVC. We'll see how it plays out and we plan on being there.

We will be at the MNDM "consultations" on August 28, 2008 - Kingston, ON - Radisson Hotel, 1 Johnson St., Harbour Front, "Harbour Shadows" room, 7-9 pm

On Friday, at 10am, (Editors note: this was last Friday) Robertsville, there will be a gathering to exchange stories and information. The gathering will begin with a smudging ceremony. Bandanas and face masks are not appropriate. Do not wear them. We will meet below the 200 meter mark, and then proceed to the gate. Please join us.

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE

2) NON-VIOLENCE TRAINING, OSO HALL, SHARBOT LAKE,
AUG 17TH, 1 - 4

Kwey all
Leah Henderson will be conducting non-violence training at the Oso Hall in Sharbot Lake on Sunday, August 17, 2008, from 1 to 4. We feel this training would assist most of us in daily encounters, but more specifically in our resistance to uranium exploration. We have steadfastly turned away from any form of violence be it verbal or physical. We still hold to that manner of interacting with others.

This being said, training in non-violence is essential when engaging in any form of resistance. In the early part of the summer, we had asked if anyone was interested in this form of training. The response had, at the time, been very favourable.

As has happened in the past, the lead-time is rather short. I apologize. It seems that it sometimes is inevitable.

The hall is almost on the corner of Elizabeth and Garrett Street in Sharbot Lake. There is a church on the corner and a cenotaph. The hall is tucked in behind.

Please phone anyone you know who is not computered. They may want to join us. Also consider passing this message along to anyone you trust would be understanding of this initiative and who would want to participate.

We haven't asked for kitchen privileges. Coffee and tea will be provided. Please bring your own cold drinks and snacks to share.

Mireille

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE

3) Reminders:

3a) August 28th, MNDM MINING ACT CONSULTATIONS,KINGSTON, ON

Radisson Hotel, 1 Johnson St., Harbour Front, "Harbour Shadows" room, 7-9 pm

3b) Aug 30 & 31st - AAFN POW WOW, Plevna, ON,

5th Anniversary Manomin (wild Rice) Victory Celebration and Pow Wow
All Nations Welcome
details at www.aafna.ca or call 613-375-6590

3c) SEPTEMBER 1, WQ-CAMU FUNDRAISER - WHITEWATER RAFTING

Esprit Rafting, one of the world's top outfitters, is helping the West Quebec Coalition Against Mining Uranium (WQ-CAMU) by hosting a fundraising event. Come join us for an exciting day of whitewater rafting on the beautiful Ottawa River and support a good cause.

Departure from Grand-Calumet Island, west Quebec, near Fort-Coulonge.
Cost: $100 rafting and lunch. ALL PROCEEDS will go to WQ-CAMU if you mention the fundraising event on registration at: 1-800-596-7238 or www.espritrafting.com

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE

4) Articles:
4a) RESIDENTS WANT TIGHTER TOXIC WATER POLLUTION LIMITS

Cameco must do a better job: Sandford Haskill
Tue Aug 12, 2008, By Jeanne Beneteau

NORTHUMBERLAND - Private testing of treated effluent from Cameco's Welcome Waste Management Facility (WWMF) agrees with the testing results the company provides to the municipality and federal nuclear authorities, says a Cameco spokesman.
On Aug. 11, a group of Ward 2 residents stated the Cameco Corporation must be forced to stop dumping treated water still contaminated with uranium and arsenic from the WWMF into Lake Ontario. Group spokesman and Ward 2 resident Sandford Haskill said a low-flying pilot noticed water pouring out of a broken pipe on a public beach where Brand Creek empties into the lake.
Click on the link for the balance of the article: http://www.northumberlandnews.com/northumberland/
news/porthope/article/105254

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE

4b) PORT HOPE RESIDENTS DEMAND CAMECO CORPORATION STOP DUMPING URANIUM INTO LAKE
Tuesday, 12 August 2008, Written by Sanford Haskill
PORT HOPE, Ontario, Canada -- Cameco Corporation must be made to stop dumping treated water still contaminated with uranium and arsenic into Lake Ontario from the Welcome Waste Management Facility, says a group of Ward Two residents.

The residents wrote Michael Binder, Ph.D, President and CEO of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission after recetory tests of water it found pouring out of a broken pipe on a public beach where Brand Creek empties into Lake Ontario.
Click on the link for the balance of the article:
http://www.activistmagazine.com/index.php?option=
com_content&task=view&id=917&Itemid=143

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE

4c) NOW YOU SEE IT, NOW YOU DON'T: UPDATE ON URANIUM IN NS
By Donna Smyth
Reprinted with permission from the author

In Nova Scotia, the issue of uranium exploitation has become entangled with the Voluntary Planning Natural Resources public sessions held throughout the province from May-June. Sessions are designed to elicit public comment on four major areas: forestry, minerals, parks, biodiversity. At this stage of "citizen engagement", they are supposed to be arm's length from DNR.

Many of us have been sadly disappointed by how Voluntary Planning has set up the process. Citizens are given about 2 minutes to speak in sessions designed to last 21/2 hours, regardless of the number of people attending. Many of us had to choose to speak on just one issue in order to register opposition to uranium exploitation. Apparently, DNR had reps at all the meetings to keep score. In fact, at the New Minas meeting, the scorekeeper blew his cover to lecture us about the value of uranium exploration. So much for arm's length from government!

Mining industry reps were present at all the meetings. Those who spoke in favour of uranium exploitation concentrated on the value of exploration which they presented as a public service to Nova Scotians. These private companies claim they're doing us a favour by mapping where uranium occurs so then we won't be tempted to build schools or houses there. They present themselves as not interested in mining, the logical conclusion of exploration.

At the New Minas and Windsor meetings, each attended by over a 150 people, there was overwhelming opposition to uranium exploitation. At the other sessions, this opposition was not so clear as many people concentrated on opposing clearcut/spraying in the forests or spoke to other areas for fear parks and biodiversity would fall between the cracks. Who knows what the scorekeepers were keeping track of?

The Minister of Natural Resources, David Morse, has said he's waiting to hear from Nova Scotians on this issue and that they should express their opinions through these sessions. He's made no secret of his own yearning to lift the moratorium which has revealed itself to be as leaky as a tailings dam. It appears exploration has temporarily slowed as Capella/Trippple Uranium have finally reported publicly that, on at least one site,they've run into samples over the 100 ppm uranium limit set by the moratorium.

The Voluntary Planning sessions end in mid-June. However, written briefs may be submitted to them until July 31st. It's important that people take the time to write, even if it's only a paragraph or two. The process is more like a sampling of public opinion, camouflaged as public consultation, to allow the government time to decide if they want to pay the political price for lifting the lid (ie., moratorium) on this issue.

Meanwhile, the Chester Municipal Council has called for the moratorium to be made law. The West Hants Council said, at the Windsor session, that they would follow suit. A new working group for Kings County has formed in Wolfville and more citizens are getting involved as they realize what's at stake for this small province. Gordon Edwards, one of Canada's foremost nuclear critics, will speak on Uranium: the Political and Health Fallout, in Wolfville and Halifax. He'll give us all lots to think about during a very busy summer.

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE

4d) URANIUM THREAT - NEW BRUNSWICKERS SAY OUR PROVINCE WILL NOT BE THE NEXT RABBIT LAKE!
By Yvonne Devine
Reprinted with permission from the author

Buoyed by high uranium prices and courted by international uranium mining companies, the New Brunswick Government is trying to take this province down a path to an industry that leaves behind a radioactive cocktail for the citizens to deal with. The waste products from uranium mining contain over a dozen radioactive, toxic materials that would threaten the Province's water sources, food chain and citizens' health for thousands of years. The Southeast Chapter of the Conservation Council of New Brunswick (CCNB Southeast) and other groups around the Province are working hard to get the facts on the table.

The Government is studying the potential impacts of tidal and wind energies and engaging the public in consultations throughout the Province. While these true "clean" energy sources are being carefully evaluated before proceeding, many wonder why the public has never been consulted on uranium mining nor has the Government conducted any studies on the impact. The Provincial Government is also promoting a second nuclear reactor - part of its plan to be an "energy hub", again with no consultations with its citizens. Both the uranium and nuclear power will be exported, but not the waste that's left behind - that's a gift for the people of New Brunswick to handle.

CCNB Southeast has so far reached over 1,800 people, through nine public information sessions, to tell them about uranium mining and its effects on the environment, health and food chain. People at these presentations are shocked and worried about uranium mining and very angry that their voices are not being heard by the Provincial Government. We will continue with these presentations to make sure that as many people as possible understand the situation and how the total cost to the Province will far outweigh the short term economic gains.

The Provincial Government's recently held its public information sessions, in Fredericton on June 4th and in Moncton on the 5th. They heard loud and clear from capacity crowds totalling close to 1,000 people, that a uranium mine is not welcome in New Brunswick. Nothing from the panel, including Health Canada's representative telling us that we are exposed to uranium all the time anyway so it's nothing to worry about to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission representative touting all the safety features in place to protect everybody. The panel also included a representative from the provincial Departments of Environment and Natural Resources. The Minister of Natural Resources was in attendance in Fredericton, but did not address the crowd despite many requests.

With the devastating effects from uranium mining waste on the front end of the nuclear chain, and the even greater threat from the nuclear waste at the end of the chain, it is inconceivable that the New Brunswick government would choose this direction. The people of New Brunswick are speaking out in greater and greater numbers against uranium mining - the Provincial Government is unwise not to listen.

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE

5) "LIVING ON EARTH AS IF WE WANT TO STAY" TOUR HEADS EAST
Along with husband, Mike Nickerson, Gramma Donna is set to leave on the eastern leg of the "Living on Earth as if we want to stay" tour.

Are they coming to a town near you?

Having had a break of 5 weeks, starting next week, they will be taking the
tour to: Stittsville, ON; Davidson, for a rafting adventure and Point Clair,
QC; Fredericton, Cocagne, Saint John, Moncton, and Saint Stevens, in NB;
Charlottetown, PEI; Truro, Brookfield, the Musquodoboit/ Moose river areas,
Chester Grant, Mahone Bay, Annapolis Royal, Digby, Bear River, Digby Neck,
Yarmouth , Wolfville, and Halifax, NS.

Four of their events are at Rotary Clubs and they are pleased to be taking
the sustainability message into the realm of business and commerce.

If you can come out to meet them along the way, please do. They will be
sponsored by long time uranium activists along the way; including Tracy
Glynn in Fredericton, NB and Gillian Thomas in Wolfville, NS.

Details at www.SustainWellBeing.net under 'tour,' then under 'where we are
going'

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE

6) DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATING THE NUCLEAR CYCLE, COURTESY OF DR. GORDON EDWARDS

http://www.ccnr.org/nukechain.html

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE

7) LETTER TO THE EDITOR, written and forwarded to the Kingston Whig by Donna Dillman

RE: Letter to the Editor from Steven Manders of Kingston
Why is it that with so much reliable information to the contrary, people still buy the nuclear industry propaganda that nuclear power is a "clean, (unpolluting) and safe" power source, when it is so obviously not true? It doesn't take a degree in rocket science to know that when you look at the entire uranium cycle (without which there would be no nuclear power) it is anything but.

What is clean, unpolluting and safe about miles of radioactive tailings dumped in drained lakes, then rising 30 to 40 feet above ground (picture the dead river system around Elliot Lake, which have to be looked after 'in perpetuity'); accidents and leaks, big and small (think Chernobyl & Three Mile Island, but there have been many lessor ones) and the lack of fuel rod storage solutions.

What is not mentioned is that the uranium that nuclear power relies on is also used for depleted uranium weapons. Having been so deeply immersed in this topic over the last year, I have come to understand that the reason nuclear power is advocated for is not to keep the lights on in Ontario, but to give us a moral high ground to extract uranium for bombs.

In regard to subsidies: With 42 billion to be gifted to the nuclear industry over the next five years, the money given over to alternatives looks like very small potatoes indeed. Nuclear may work "day and night," as Manders states, but the plants are very inefficient, and are up and running less than 50% of the time and much is lost in transmission. Nuclear may, indeed, "outlast the oil era," but uranium, on which it depends, is also non-sustainable and I couldn't help smiling, sadly, to read nuclear waste being described as beautiful. Lastly, it is my understanding that Canadian energy consumption is actually on the decline, now that peak oil and climate change are 'in the news.'

Our children and grandchildren will not thank us for being so easily deceived.

The other side of the story was addressed during the Citizens' Inquiry into the Impacts of the Uranium Cycle in eastern Ontario this spring. The report is available online at www.ccamu.ca and the submissions received can be viewed at www.uraniumcitizensinquiry.com .

Alternatives and solutions to the energy crisis do exist and are being proven in jurisdictions around the world.

Donna Dillman

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE

8) LETTER TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE STEVEN HARPER,
from Carmi Gallant

Dear Right Honourable Steven Harper,

A Moratorium on the mining for Uranium is required immediately to reduce long-lasting health problems, domestically and abroad within the Canadian general populous, and within soldiers whom serve in the Canadian Armed Forces. Many terrible illnesses are undeniably connected within effluent toxins that leave these sites. These sites are in turn, inextricably linked to Human cancer clusters, and disease clusters in human beings and to surrounding environment.

Today's modern military does rely on Uranium products and as well do the
constituencies who participate in our electoral process.

Please do the right thing for my children and their children.
Please take the proper actions to benefit your children and their children.
Before the Robertsville Uranium Mine becomes a Federal matter, the
Federal Government need intervene and close it down!

Otimistically yours, carmi Gallant

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE